Month: May 2017

Use Photoshop? This is a Must Have . . .

Use Photoshop? This is a Must Have . . .

Adobe Photoshop CS6 on Demand

by Steve Johnson

Perspection, Inc.,

 

 

 

Those of us who have used Photoshop for more days than we care to count tend to forget that once upon a time we were newbies to the program. While the CS6 version may be new to us, we bring a whole lot from the 12 previous iterations to the light table. Can any of us imagine what CS6 looks like to a first-time user? It has to be something approaching overwhelming. That said, there is a new book on the market that can address the needs of both ends of the Photoshop user spectrum and everyone in between.

Que Publishing’s Adobe Photoshop CS6 on Demand, by Steve Johnson of Perspection, Inc., is two things: It is the book that I’ve needed since Photoshop and I crossed paths in 1995. It is also the book that Adobe needs to package with the program.

This is not a traditional training manual in the sense of “select this,” “click that,” “drag here,” etc. While it is basically an explainer for each of the program’s many tools, it is much more. This is pointed out in the introduction; “You don’t have to read this book in any particular order.” It was designed for the user to “jump in,” get the needed information, and “jump out.”

Tools, or tasks, are on no more than two facing pages, accessed from the very detailed 11-page table of contents. The pages themselves are graphically not only pleasing, but utilitarian. The user will not fall asleep reading this text. The eye gravitates—after a little use of the book—where it needs to go. For each task, there are step-by-step instructions in the left column with corresponding illustrations in the right. These are supported by real-world examples.

Example files are available at a proprietary web site. Two files are provided for each example, a “start” file and a result. The user compares his results to that provided. Similarly, more intensive Workshop projects also feature start, result, and associated files that can be accessed on the web. The book can also be used as a training basis for Adobe certification. Specific tasks have been highlighted, which once mastered, will help the user to meet requirements for the two exams.

For the not-so-new to Photoshop user the additions to CS6 from CS5 are highlighted throughout with a “New!” icon. That will not prevent those users from learning more about their commonly used tools than they ever knew and investigating those that never seemed of much interest, utility, or confusing. I know that this book has expanded my personal tool kit.

This is a must-have book in any Photoshop user’s library.

Reviewed June 2012

(In the interest of full disclosure, Cue Publishing provided this reviewer a review copy of the book.)

 

 

Prototype for a decent book, but who wants to buy a prototype?

Prototype for a decent book, but who wants to buy a prototype?

 

Pregabalin mail order US Battleships 1941-1963 an Illustrated http://dkarim.com/my_alfa.php Technical Reference

by Wayne Scarpaci

 

 

 

This book is not worth your money. It would make a good sales tool for marketing to a decent publishing house, but this is not a finished product.

It is in woeful need of two editors – one for the author’s words and one for images. The author, on his contents page, has even misnamed one his own paintings, unless of course he did mean “Quite Backwaters”. This is only the first of many typo–“A BB took 5-8 mouths to scrap.” (p. 68)—grammatical, and construction errors that mark the effort as amateurish.

On the surface, the book is a grabber, one that any ship fanatic would feel he couldn’t do without. Who can turn their back on 252 photos, 52 paintings, and 86 line drawings of battleships? Wow! Gotta have it. But wait. That’s 390 images on 134 pages and each page is only 8×10. That’s not a lot of real estate for imagery, let alone any copy. So, the images are all small. It is near impossible to pick out any detail in the author’s paintings or the photographs. Virtually all the photographs are profile, 3/4 bow – stern shots. Very few are detail shots, and the reader is supposed to pick out details from photos barely 2 inches wide.

In a photo book reproduction is paramount. Paper should be pure white, dense enough for no bleed through from the other side of the page, and coated for a precise image. This paper is not white, too thin, and uncoated. The uncoated paper allows the ink to set into the fibers and bleed, producing a blurred image. Further, the author apparently doesn’t know much about imaging line art. All his line drawings have significant artifacts which severely affects their sharpness. They are simply bad. I wish I could comment on his paintings, but they are too small and so poorly reproduced that a valid observation cannot be made. That’s enough comment in itself.

I won’t go into the copy except to say it is basically a rehash of the author’s sources, all the books of which should be readily familiar to anyone even beginning to look at the history of battleships.

Save your money on this incarnation.

If the author ever gets a real publisher this might be worth taking a second look.

 

Reviewed April 2009.

 

 

Great Addition to an Aviation Collection

Great Addition to an Aviation Collection

U.S. Naval Air Superiority: Delevelopment of Shipborne Jet Fighters — 1943–1962

by Tommy H. Thomason

Specialty Press

2008

This book is a worthwhile investment not only of your money but also your time in reading it.

This book isn’t exactly for the novice reader of naval air material. It presupposes that you bring something to the table in terms of basic knowledge and perhaps some aerodynamics. But that shouldn’t preclude an absolute beginner from picking up this book.

Just looking at the photos (which are excellent) and reading the captions will provide a decent grounding in naval air for the period covered. If that novice should delve into the text, so much the better for there is a wealth of detail that true aeroaficionados will love.

The only disappointing aspect of this book is its illustrations (not the photographs). The drawings of aircraft profiles are amateurist, misleading, and definitely not in keeping with the tenor of this book, which is high-class and informative. But that pales in comparison to what is otherwise available between the covers. You will enjoy this book.

Reviewed September 2008.

Men of Forrestal Deserve Much Better

Men of Forrestal Deserve Much Better

Sailors to the End

by Gregory A. Freeman

William Morrow & Co., Inc.

2002

 

 

 

The men—the heroes—of the USS Forrestal deserve better.

Sailors to the End: The Deadly Fire on the USS Forrestal and the Heroes Who Fought It by Gregory A. Freeman (July 2002, William Morrow, $25.95) is, for those unaware or only superficially aware of the events depicted, an engaging, heartbreaking, and powerful read.

It will make the basis for a good 2000-ish special effects movie.

Freeman—an “award-wining journalist”—however, misplaced his journalistic tools when writing this book.

Forty-one years ago, on Saturday, July 29, 1967, the Virginia-born and based USS Forrestal, the first of the super-carriers, was racked by fires and explosions while on Yankee Station off the North Vietnamese coast. It started when a rocket accidentally fired from an F-4 Phantom II fighter hit the fuel tank of a bomb-laden A-4 Skyhawk. One hundred thirty-four sailors and airmen died, hundreds more were wounded, many horribly. Forrestal was but one unlucky explosion from the sea bottom.

Sailors to the End attempts to relate the story in the human terms of the crew who lived the horror of that day.

When the minutia that puts the stamp of veracity onto a subject known by a reader isn’t there or—worse—is wrong, it paints the whole work. Such is the case with this book. Freeman should have hired a competent editor who knows something about the Navy and aircraft carriers. Plus he should have interviewed at least a few of the principals he quoted. Some of the minutia: His description of the catapult launching mechanism more accurately describes that in use today, not the method Forrestal used 41 years ago. An illustration showing the placement of aircraft on deck at the time of the fire is inaccurate and uses F-16—a current Air Force model—outlines and a generic outline to illustrate four different types of aircraft. He uses the term “aviation groups” when making reference to the two fighter squadrons aboard Forrestal. The “head knock” in an A-4 was generally called the “head knocker.”

We learn not only that “the Midway-class ships . . . had played such important roles in World War II” (What were those roles if the first, Midway, was commissioned eight days after the Japanese surrender?) but also that oxygen is the “quintessential fuel for any fire.” That’s not aviation or Navy; it’s bad science, sloppy editing, and poor journalism.

These alone do not make for a bad book, not even for what qualifies as history in today’s pop writings. What does make a bad book is an obvious deliberate omission.

From various citations, the reader can tell Freeman read in part and relied to some degree on the definitive government report on the fire: the Basic Final Investigative Report Concerning the Fire on Board the USS Forrestal (CVA-59). Indeed, it is listed in his bibliography.

Throughout the book, one of the central characters is Lieutenant Commander John S. McCain III, now the senior senator from Arizona. Freeman cites—as do many other sources including the senator—that it was McCain’s Skyhawk that was struck by the Zuni rocket.

However, the first sentence of the Investigative Report at the behest of Rear Admiral Forsyth Massey, Commander in Chief U.S. Atlantic Fleet, states that “A review of the voluminous material contained in the Report of Investigation establishes the central fact that a ZUNI rocket was inadvertently fired from an F-4 aircraft (#110) and struck the external fuel tank of an A-4 aircraft (#405) . . . ”

McCain’s aircraft number was 416.

This is not to imply that McCain is engaging in deceit and others are perpetuating a myth. Quite the contrary; it is in the literal heat of such an occurrence that observation and recollection have their limits. This is simply a matter of written fact as determined by a duly appointed and highly technical investigative body.

Nowhere in the book is the statement of fact as found by the investigative body noted. A good journalist would note the statement of fact no matter what his beliefs. Freeman did not.

What is worse is that the pilot of #405, Lieutenant Commander Fred D. White, is not mentioned anywhere in the book with the sole exception under the list of dead. His rank and pilot status are not mentioned.

White was one of only three pilots killed that day. The others are named as is a description of the occurrence of their deaths. On the previously cited drawing, of the five aircraft involved in the center of the conflagration, all have the pilot’s names beside them, except one. The one in the center. White’s #405.

This is so obvious, it makes one wonder why—if you knew about White in the first place. Reading Sailors to the End, how would one ever know of Fred White?

#405 and Lieutenant Commander White throw a monkey wrench into an otherwise good structure. Maybe this review shouldn’t have mentioned them either.

The final insult to the memory of those who fought for their ship and died so bravely is that many of them aren’t given their due. One would hope that the intention was to spare family members additional grief. It doesn’t read that way.

More than a few can be easily identified by anyone with access to the Investigative Report. They are not. The more fortunate ones get first names or nicknames. One of the dead so named, however, was not on the deceased list.

Then there are questions concerning the principals.

More than a full page is devoted to Captain—then Lieutenant (j.g.)—Dave Dollarhide’s experiences. Dollarhide was never interviewed by Freeman. Dollarhide told me so when I interviewed him. McCain’s Skyhawk was between that of Dollarhide on the left and White’s on the right. Freeman has Dollarhide escaping by going over the nose of the aircraft, when with fire all around the right of his A-4, Dollarhide jumped over the left sill. Freeman also misidentified his rescuer.

Senator McCain’s actions were described including that “he heard two loud clanks.” “I never said that. I don’t know where he got that,” the senator told this reviewer. The author never interviewed McCain according to the senator. I did.

Admittedly, there is a little sniping in this review. All the shots, however, are warranted. Many of the proud crew of Forrestal will look to this book as their story. Rightly so. It is, but, there are crucial points, which make it significantly less than what it could and should have been.

The definitive book on the gallant men and their ship has yet to be written.

 

Reviewed September 2008.

Typical of the Tech Volumes

Typical of the Tech Volumes

Boeing B-17-Flying Fortress – Warbird Tech Vol. 7

by Frederick A. Johnsen

Specialty Press

2002

 

 

This whole series is spotty. Frankly, I recommend them only to those who have a pretty good understanding of the aircraft covered. These volumes, and this is typical of them, tend to focus on little known aspects of the aircraft. To get the most from them, they presupose some knowledge of the basic aircraft. Even at this, they are somewhat disappointing. They are spotty in coverage of the details and the photographic reproduction is abysmal.

 

Reviewed June 2007.

Stellar

Stellar

The Schweinfurt-Regensburg Mission: American Raids on 17 August 1943

by Martin Middlebrook

Penguin UK

1995

 

 

I am an unabashed Martin Middlebrook fan. I will read anything he writes.

Middlebrook’s work is typically well-researched and detailed. His narratives are not too shabby either. His attention to detail allows the thinking reader to meticulously reconstruct the battles. If you want to know about U.S. daylight bombing over Germany during World War II, there is no better place to start.

Reviewed June 2007.

Judge a Book by its Cover?

Judge a Book by its Cover?

Five Days in August: How World War II Became a Nuclear War

by Michael D. Gordin

Princeton University Press

2007

 

 

I don’t know what is in this book, I haven’t gotten past the cover.

While the Bell VB-13 (later ASM-A-1) Tarzon bomb looks impressive, it never was a nuclear weapon nor was it intended to be one.

If the publishers didn’t attend to this most obvious of the book’s details, how did they address its lesser known points, which after all, are why readers would buy this book?

 

Reviewed April 2007.

A “Must Have”

A “Must Have”

The Airplane A History of Its Technology

By John D. Anderson Jr.

 

 

 

 

This is a simple review.

            “If you are a general reader without a background in engineering and science, but are interested in airplanes and the history of flight, this book is for you.”

If this, the first sentence of the book’s preface, describes you, John Anderson’s book should be in your possession. It is the book for you.

This is a very powerful summation. It is, however, warranted.

Its 359-pages are presented in eminently readable fashion, the type taking up about 2/3rds the width of a page. The remaining width of the page is used for the presentation of inset graphics, photographs, charts and captions. The illustrations, as numbered figures, are linked directly to the text they explain.

Once beyond the temptation of simply perusing the book by dipping into topics that the reader finds particularly interesting, one finds that each chapter is a book unto itself.   The seven chapters divide up the technological history of flight into pre-19th Century, 19th Century, the Wright Flyer, the “Strut-and-Wire” Biplane, the “Mature” Propeller-Driven Airplane and the Jet-Propelled Airplane.

Anderson defines the last two as the First and Second Design Revolutions. One has the sense that, given the opportunity, he could have provided a very detailed account of the Third Design Revolution.

The author has done a masterful job of incorporating the engineering aspects of aeronautics into the narrative of the airplane’s development without overwhelming the reader. In this manner, this book can be read on several levels.

If physics, mathematical symbols and formula scare the reader, simply ignore them. The prose will provide much more insight into the airplane’s development than the average knowledgeable reader brings to the table.

On the other hand, the more one cares to delve into an understanding of the physics and formulae, the greater the comprehension is of what amazing achievements were accomplished by the first aeronautical engineers.

This book is a must have.

________________________________________________

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics

1801 Alexander Bell Drive

Reston, VA   20191-4344

©2002

No price indicated

 

Reviewed May 25, 2004

 

 

 

Tank Aero Engines

Tank Aero Engines

The Story of the Tank Aero Engines

By Richard C. Hill

 

 

This 70-page, softbound, self-published work is obviously a labor of love. While it has its failings, many of which are not insignificant, this monograph nevertheless remains an important work. If Mr. Hill had not written this, then who would have?

My “go-to” reference on aircraft engines, A History of Aircraft Piston Engines by Herschel Smith, gives all of six sentences to the Tank engines. Obviously, if one is piqued by Smith’s description of a “somewhat strange engine,” Mr. Hill’s work is, for now, the best reference.

Not many more than 100 examples of two different Tank engines, Models 63 and 73, were built in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, by the Milwaukee Parts Corporation during a period from roughly 1928 to 1932. Other than being a bump in the road of aero engine development, the engines demonstrated what could happen if free-thinking engineers had their way with the status quo.

In this case the status quo was the—almost literally—carved in stone Curtiss OX-5 engine. Its detriments are widely known—complex lubrication requirements and overly weighty liquid cooling system, among them—making for notorious unreliability.

Frank C. Tank, who had some interesting connections, which you will discover in the book, thought that the OX-5 in a Jenny he had bought could be improved. He redesigned it for air-cooling. He convinced his brother, Alfred J. Tank, an engineer, to quit his job and work up the designs with him for the new engine. Together, they approached Edwin J. Michalski of the Milwaukee Parts Corporation to produce the engine. Therein lie the stories of the Tank engines.

The information provided in the stories of the characters and the engines is quite interesting and engaging, if one can wade through the informality of the prose. This is written almost like an expansive e-mail missive. Repetition is rife. Whole paragraphs from one page appear in rewritten form just a page later.   The text cries for an editor.

In general the presentation is pleasant, but frustrating. Where the photographs are about the best I have seen in this type of publication—crisp, contrasty with open shadows, which reveal a fair amount of detail—the same cannot be said for the typography and design.

Paragraphs should be obvious. The only indication of a paragraph is a slightly indented line—about the width of a lowercase “i”—and shortened line of type just above. This presentation gives the sense of one huge block of type. This is neither inviting to the eye nor conducive to digesting information in palatable bites. Further, the use of boxed copy blocks throughout had me dividing my time between reading the body text and the boxed text. It was more a distraction than an aid, which is what it should be.

Despite these failings, I would recommend this to anyone interested in the minutia of aero engine history. There are a number of jumping off points for further research, especially the activities of Frank C. Tank.

________________________________________________

 

Self-published, 2002

$10 plus $2 postage

Available from:            Richard C. Hill

Box 328

Harvard, IL

60033-0328

 

Reviewed December 17, 2003

 

 

 

One person’s opinion

One person’s opinion

Douglas DC-6 and DC-7 – Airliner Tech Vol. 4

 

by Harry S. Gann

Specialty Press

1999

 

Harry Gann, who recently died, left the aviation community with a solid body of work. This book, in typical Gann fashion, punches through the veneer of the Tech series of books.

On the surface, the series as a whole, promises much. In reality, they are at best inconsistant in presentation and information.

In this book, Gann’s genius is visible beneath the framework.

Of the 8 books of this series that I own, this is the most comprehensive and direct presentation of the subject aircraft. Unlike others of the series, this book focuses on the topic at hand. The diversions into the minutia and one-offs are focussed and appropriate. If you want to know the history of the DC-6 and DC-7, you can’t find a better starting point than this book.

The point of this particular work is that it is hard to hold a good writer down. The documentation of aviation history suffered a great loss with Gann’s passing.

Reviewed February 2001.

Verified by ExactMetrics